Automotive
industry deals with automobiles. Within this ambit fall two types of
firms: OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) and component
suppliers. While
there seem to be multiple perspectives with respect to what is an
OEM, as
discussed in
Wikipedia,
I will correspond to my interpretation of the spirit prevalent in a
Stern Stewart and Co article accessed from their website.
OEM
is the name given to such firms which provide us with the final
automobile that bears their brand name; examples from India include
Tata
Motors, Maruti Suzuki, Mahindra and Mahindra, Bajaj Auto, Eicher
Motors etc..There’s
nothing necessarily
duplicate, spurious or unoriginal about the second category of firms
classified as suppliers. Its just that their brand names don’t
usually appear in a visible manner in the final vehicle sold to the
consumer. In any case, since no such firms appear in the Nifty, I’ll
be focusing on the OEMs.
Classification
of Automobiles
Classification
of automobiles can be done in various ways. The vehicles that are
targeted towards
moving passengers are called passenger vehicles (PV) and those that
carry goods are called commercial vehicles (CV). Vehicles
that have four or more wheels are generally classified first on such
a basis. Two wheelers and three wheelers, despite having a
possibility of being classified thus, are first segregated out by
classifying them on the basis of the number of wheels. So these two
form the categories two wheelers and three wheelers. Such
considerations lead the Society of Indian Automobile Manufactures
(SIAM), an
industry association,
to classify their sales data for automobiles under the following
heads: Passenger Vehicles, Commercial Vehicles, Three Wheelers and
Two Wheelers.
Passenger
vehicles are themselves classified into various categories. Tata
Motors, for instance, speaks of the following categories in their
annual report for Financial Year (FY) 2016 (which extends from April
2015 to March 2016):
Micro, Compact, Mid-Size, Premium and Luxury, Utility Vehicles and
Vans. Mahindra
and Mahindra (M&M) exercise some
parsimony
in their choice of passenger vehicles sub category, listing only
Cars, utility vehicles and vans. This needs to be understood in the
context of their history of manufacturing “jeep”s
for the longest time and then foraying in to the sports utility
vehcile (SUV) category.
Maruti
Suzuki India
Limited (MSIL) has historically competed majorly in the compact
category, with recent forays into other categories, hence they
provide sales breakup for only the following categories in their
annual report: Passenger Cars, UVs, vans and PVs. However, references
to such segments as hatchbacks, crossovers etc. are interspersed in
the various discussions therein, so the sense I have is that such
category
boundaries
are treated as fluidic, rather
than something set in stone.
All these
classes should be familiar to those who pay attention to the vehicles
on the road, have bought cars, or are simply enthusiasts. Those not
in the know-how are luckier since they get to familiarize themselves
with the more official classification provided by SIAM, with
examples provided, courtesy Wikipedia.
I
don’t intend to adhere to any of these as such and will be pretty
ad hoc in my usage throughout
any report I may write, while
being true to my experiences as a layman, having a consumer’s
perspective with regard to the automotive industry.
The context should sufficiently inform
the classification implied in any such case.
Coming
to commercial vehicles, various OEMs have various classifications
they provide. Tata Motors and M&M classify them into Medium &
Heavy Commercial Vehicles and Light Commercial Vehicles in their
annual report, with sub classifications based on carrying capacity.
Another Nifty component firm that manufactures commercial vehicles is
Eicher Motors Limited. It plays in this segment in the trucks and
buses space and classifies its commercial vehicles in to Buses, Light
Medium Duty trucks and Heavy Duty trucks for
its Eicher brand products. It also has a joint venture with Volvo
that manufactures trucks.
Following
Hero Motocorp, I adopt the classification of two wheelers into
motorcycles, scooters and mopeds. The two Nifty component competitors
to it,
Bajaj Auto and Eicher Motors, compete only in the motorcycle
category. While this category may be sub divided into various
segments like mass market and performance, commuter and sports biking
etc, the only clearly spelt out
classification from among the various ARs
belongs to Hero Motocorp who classify it
into entry, premium and deluxe. However, this classification does not
seem to find resonance with the other players. In
any case, it’s not as if there aren’t other sources available,
for instance one
online source that makes up in conciseness
what it lacks in complexity. The inter
category dynamics are not apparent from the annual reports and I will
dwell upon them in a later post if needed.
Since
three wheelers are kept outside the passenger and commercial vehicle
classification in the first pass, this is done on a sub category
basis. An
ICRA report on the segment adopts this
classification. Hence three wheelers are classified as passenger and
cargo. Bajaj Auto also uses the nomenclature quadricycle in
conjunction with the three wheeler segment, reporting consolidated
sales for the three wheeler and quadricycle segment.
Market
Sizing And Forecasting
My
market data is based on data
published by SIAM (historical) and Ernst
and Young (EY; forecasts). Three
wheeler market growth forecast attributed
to ICRA obtained from a Business
Standard article for FY 2017 has been used
for all years up to 2020. The data is plotted in the following graph.
All the values are in lakhs of units.
All
the forecasts seem to be on the optimistic side, since the CAGR
(Cumulative Average Growth Rate) for the categories over the past
five years is much less than the forecast CAGRs up to 2020. A
comparison of the CAGRs is provided in the following graph.
The
reasons cited for
the expected pickup in growth straddle the entire spectrum of the
value chain from digital analysis aided decision making to friendly
regulatory policies with respect to foreign direct investment (FDI).
However, I remain a skeptic because in my limited understanding much
of consumer led consumption in India depends on disposable incomes
which in turn depends on the monsoon in any given year, i.e., it is
more demand driven than supply driven. The finicky Indian
entrepreneurs,
probably don’t like to stick their
neck
out on consultants’ forecasts and let inventory accumulate, waiting
for the consumer to behave as per the consultant’s forecasts.
Additionally, consultants may have a tendency to see the prospects of
any industry with rose-tinted glasses probably because it helps them
get more assignments. For instance, one
report projected passenger vehicles volume to 30.7 lakhs in
2013, whereas the achievement was only around 27 lakhs, roughly 11%
lower. Yet
another provided a range for all the way up to 2020, with two
extreme cases taken as aggressive
(high
sales)
and
conservative
(low
sales). However, the actual sales number in 2016 came in way lower
than even the lowest figure in the range, less
by
at
least about 20%.
Hence, while I accept the EY and ICRA forecasts for now (for want of
alternatives), as my understanding of the sector deepens, I may, and
indeed do expect to, switch to more original forecasts informed by my
own interpretation of the fundamentals.
Having
covered the market segmentation, sizing and forecasting in this post,
I will try to unearth the technology, tastes and preferences that
dictate purchase considerations in the next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment